Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 142 • VG SZ III 2019 142 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2019 142
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding the custody arrangements for a minor child. The appellant sought to overturn the lower authority's determination concerning the child's living situation and visitation rights. The court reviewed the evidence presented to the lower authority, focusing on the child's best interests as the paramount consideration, and ultimately upheld the prior decision, finding no basis to conclude that the authority had disregarded essential facts or applied the relevant legal standards improperly in establishing the current custody arrangement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld: The appellant sought to overturn the lower authority's determination concerning the child's living situation and visitation rights. The court reviewed the evidence presented to the lower authority, focusing on the child's best interests as the paramount consideration, and ultimately upheld the prior decision, finding no basis to conclude that the authority had disregarded essential facts or applied the relevant legal standards improperly in establishing the current custody arrangement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse del figlio autorità di protezione degli adulti procedura di affidamento genitoriale diritto acquisito protezione del figlio perizia giuridica
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 55
Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision
III 2021 97
Child Custody Appeal Affirmation
III 2016 7
Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody
ZK1 2020 6
Custody and Visitation Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 142 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw E.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n