Appeal Regarding Child Protection Directives
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal concerned the decision of a child and adult protection authority to issue directives regarding the care and upbringing of a minor, where the appellants challenged the necessity and scope of these measures. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the existing circumstances demonstrated a risk to the child's well-being that justified the state's intervention, and the imposed directives were appropriate and proportionate to address the identified educational needs and risks.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Child Protection Directives: The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the existing circumstances demonstrated a risk to the child's well-being that justified the state's intervention, and the imposed directives were appropriate and proportionate to address the identified educational needs and risks.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe provision was applied to determine the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 140 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. September 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n gesetzlich vertreten durch B.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Innerschwyz, Postfach 1240, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n ZGB (Weisungen nach