Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2019 122 • VG SZ III 2019 122 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations

Numero d'incarto III 2019 122
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant challenged a municipal council's refusal to issue a building permit for the construction of a multi-family house, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal development authority and the cantonal government, arguing that the proposed development did not violate the spatial planning regulations regarding density and building height. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
superamento dell'altezza massima licenza edilizia comunale norme per l'edilizia restrizioni di zona approvazione dei piani proprietà immobiliare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 122 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Galgenen, Büelstrasse 15, 8854 Siebnen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n