Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 113 • VG SZ III 2019 113 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Municipal Council Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2019 113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a municipal council's decision, with the appellant represented by counsel, challenging the decision made by the municipal council, the cantonal spatial development office, and the cantonal government council, where the court must rule on the merits of the appeal concerning the contested administrative decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Against Municipal Council Decision: The case involves an appeal against a municipal council's decision, with the appellant represented by counsel, challenging the decision made by the municipal council, the cantonal spatial development office, and the cantonal government council, where the court must rule on the merits of the appeal concerning the contested administrative decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione del comune referendum chiesto dall'autorità ricorso per carenza legittimazione a ricorrere autonomia comunale impugnazione di decisioni amministrative Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision orders the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 44
Appeal Against Municipal Council Administrative Decision
III 2017 100
Appeal Dismissed Against Municipal Council Decision
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision orders the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, \n Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n