Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 101 • VG SZ III 2019 101 Generato dall'IA

Corporation v. District Council Contract Award Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2019 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative proceeding involved an appeal by a corporation against a decision of a district council, which had awarded a contract to a second corporation. The appellant corporation challenged the award decision, asserting procedural or substantive errors in the evaluation process. The court, reviewing the administrative decision, reasoned that the initial evaluation by the district council, which formed the basis for the award, contained no discernible error or procedural flaw that would warrant overturning the selection of the winning bidder, thereby upholding the district council's original decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Corporation v. District Council Contract Award Appeal: The appellant corporation challenged the award decision, asserting procedural or substantive errors in the evaluation process. The court, reviewing the administrative decision, reasoned that the initial evaluation by the district council, which formed the basis for the award, contained no discernible error or procedural flaw that would warrant overturning the selection of the winning bidder, thereby upholding the district council's original decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di diritto amministrativo controllo della procedura errore amministrativo aggiudicazione di appalto comunale contenzioso contrattuale motivazione nel merito
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 189
Corporate Appeal of District Authority Decision
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision
III 2021 85
Company v. District Council: Enforcement of Repayment Ruling
I 2024 59
Contractual Dispute Appeal Against Corporation Ruling
ZK1 2022 35
Contractual Work Dispute Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 101 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. D.________ AG, \n Beigeladene und Zuschlagsempfängerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. E.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n