Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 98 • VG SZ III 2018 98 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal

Numero d'incarto III 2018 98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the provisional withdrawal of a driving license based on traffic law. The appellant, represented by their mother and counsel, challenged the decision made by the cantonal transport authority. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the authority, finding the action justified under the relevant traffic regulations, though specific reasoning regarding the underlying facts leading to the provisional withdrawal is not detailed in this excerpt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal: The appellant, represented by their mother and counsel, challenged the decision made by the cantonal transport authority. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the authority, finding the action justified under the relevant traffic regulations, though specific reasoning regarding the underlying facts leading to the provisional withdrawal is not detailed in this excerpt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre diritto dei trasporti esame d'idoneità alla guida autorizzazione provvisoria infrazione al codice della strada concessione per esercizio taxi Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 90
Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal
III 2018 196
Motorist Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Upheld
III 2021 91
Traffic License Withdrawal Appeal Upheld
III 2018 75
Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal)
III 2019 177
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 98 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch seine Mutter B.________, \n diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: