Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 97 • VG SZ III 2018 97 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner v. Cantonal Authorities Regarding Building Permit Conditions

Numero d'incarto III 2018 97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner challenged a building permit issued by the local council and subsequently confirmed by higher cantonal authorities, arguing that the stipulated supplementary conditions concerning mandatory landscape and open space planning were legally unfounded and excessively burdensome. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the challenged supplementary conditions were validly based on the relevant regional and municipal planning provisions, served to adequately protect public interests, and were not disproportionate or legally improper restrictions on the property owner's rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Owner v. Cantonal Authorities Regarding Building Permit Conditions: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the challenged supplementary conditions were validly based on the relevant regional and municipal planning provisions, served to adequately protect public interests, and were not disproportionate or legally improper restrictions on the property owner's rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oneri della licenza edilizia diritto di proprietà spazio pubblico ente pubblico territoriale disciplina urbanistica deroga alla licenza edilizia Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung; Auflagen) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 97 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat Reichenburg, Kanzleiweg, Postfach 242, 8864 Reichenburg, 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, 3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung; Nebenbestimmungen) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: