Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 96 • VG SZ III 2018 96 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2018 96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a building permit issued by the local council for a project, with the administrative body rejecting the complaints lodged by the appellants. The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient basis because the challenged construction permit decision did not violate any applicable spatial planning regulations, specifically finding no basis to substantiate the appellants' claims regarding the project's alleged inconsistency with the local development plan or its impact on neighborhood interests, thereby upholding the lower administrative decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld: The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient basis because the challenged construction permit decision did not violate any applicable spatial planning regulations, specifically finding no basis to substantiate the appellants' claims regarding the project's alleged inconsistency with the local development plan or its impact on neighborhood interests, thereby upholding the lower administrative decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia approvazione dei piani reclamo amministrativo divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico proprietà fondiaria polizia delle costruzioni Planungs- und Baurecht (nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the complaint did not meet the requirement of substantiation regarding the alleged violation of Article 182 of the Cantonal Building Regulations.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2024 139
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the complaint did not meet the requirement of substantiation regarding the alleged violation of Article 182 of the Cantonal Building Regulations.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n Ziff. 1 vertreten durch Ziff. 2; Ziff. 2 und 3 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. E.________ AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n |\n

\n\n

\n