Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 95 • VG SZ III 2018 95 Generato dall'IA

Appellants v. Municipal Council on Spatial Development

Numero d'incarto III 2018 95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Thirteen appellants challenged a decision by a municipal council, which was subsequently upheld by a cantonal governmental body and a cantonal planning office, regarding a matter of spatial development concerning their property rights. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the challenged decision regarding the planning framework was based on an assessment of public interest and relevant planning criteria that was not demonstrably arbitrary or contrary to essential legal principles, thereby upholding the prior administrative rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellants v. Municipal Council on Spatial Development: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the challenged decision regarding the planning framework was based on an assessment of public interest and relevant planning criteria that was not demonstrably arbitrary or contrary to essential legal principles, thereby upholding the prior administrative rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di proprietà decisione quadro incentivazione immobiliare terreno comunale obbligo di pianificare problema urbano Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2019 231
Spatial Planning Dispute: Municipal and Cantonal Decisions Challenged
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed
III 2019 214
Applicants v. Municipal Zoning Board

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 95 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n9. I.________, \n10. J.________, \n11. K.________, \n12. L.________, \n13. M.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. N.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n