Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 93 • VG SZ III 2018 93 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Amendment Upholding Local Development Plan

Numero d'incarto III 2018 93
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of ten parties appealed a decision concerning an amendment to a local zoning plan that designated certain undeveloped land as building land, which was approved by the local council and subsequently by the cantonal authorities. The court reasoned that the zoning amendment, while potentially infringing on property rights, served a legitimate public interest in ensuring adequate infrastructure and housing supply within the municipality, and the decision to reclassify the land was based on a reasonable planning assessment that did not demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion or an unconstitutional application of land-use law, thus upholding the challenged zoning change.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Zoning Amendment Upholding Local Development Plan: The court reasoned that the zoning amendment, while potentially infringing on property rights, served a legitimate public interest in ensuring adequate infrastructure and housing supply within the municipality, and the decision to reclassify the land was based on a reasonable planning assessment that did not demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion or an unconstitutional application of land-use law, thus upholding the challenged zoning change.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
piano di utilizzazione apprezzamento in materia di pianificazione diritto fondiario incentivazione immobiliare diritto allo sviluppo diritto di utilizzazione Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This article governs the imposition of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 87
Zoning Amendment Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2022 111
Zoning Plan Modification Upheld Despite Appeal
III 2019 26
Zoning Amendment Challenge Upheld Against Objectors
III 2018 227
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This article governs the imposition of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 93 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________ \n9. I.________, \n10. J.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. K.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n