Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 90 • VG SZ III 2018 90 Generato dall'IA

Traffic License Revocation Due to Repeated Violations

Numero d'incarto III 2018 90
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought judicial review after the traffic authority revoked their driving license, finding that their repeated traffic violations demonstrated a lack of reliability to drive. The court upheld the revocation, reasoning that the accumulation of traffic offenses, including speeding and other violations over a period of time, established a factual basis for the administrative authority to conclude that the appellant posed a risk to public traffic safety and therefore warranted the withdrawal of their license to ensure road safety.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic License Revocation Due to Repeated Violations: The court upheld the revocation, reasoning that the accumulation of traffic offenses, including speeding and other violations over a period of time, established a factual basis for the administrative authority to conclude that the appellant posed a risk to public traffic safety and therefore warranted the withdrawal of their license to ensure road safety.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre infrazione alle norme della circolazione sindacato giurisdizionale sicurezza stradale base fattuale guida recidiva in stato di ebbrezza Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal
III 2017 190
Judicial Review of Driving License Revocation
III 2019 159
Driver License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2018 26
Driver License Revocation Upheld
III 2020 33
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 90 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: