Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 9 • VG SZ III 2018 9 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2018 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging a decision by local and cantonal authorities regarding the approval of development plans. The appellant contested the underlying planning decisions, arguing they were flawed or unlawfully enacted. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged planning decisions violated their rights, specifically noting that the appellant did not substantiate claims of procedural defects or substantive illegality in the official planning process that directly prejudiced their legal standing to challenge the outcome.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision: The appellant contested the underlying planning decisions, arguing they were flawed or unlawfully enacted. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged planning decisions violated their rights, specifically noting that the appellant did not substantiate claims of procedural defects or substantive illegality in the official planning process that directly prejudiced their legal standing to challenge the outcome.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
approvazione dei piani legittimazione a ricorrere vizio di procedura legittimazione a contestare licenza diritto allo sviluppo ente locale Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung, Balkonanbau) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 127
Planning Authority Decision Appeal
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision
III 2017 234
Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n