Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 81 • VG SZ III 2018 81 Generato dall'IA

Medical Professional Authorization Revocation Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2018 81
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision regarding the revocation of their authorization to practice as a medical professional, following an administrative finding that they had violated professional duties by engaging in unauthorized fee adjustments and failing to maintain proper documentation of services rendered to certain patients. The court reasoned that the administrative authority acted within its discretion by determining that the documented instances of non-compliance with billing regulations and record-keeping obligations constituted a significant breach of professional standards sufficient to justify the revocation of the practice authorization, thereby upholding the prior decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Medical Professional Authorization Revocation Upheld: The court reasoned that the administrative authority acted within its discretion by determining that the documented instances of non-compliance with billing regulations and record-keeping obligations constituted a significant breach of professional standards sufficient to justify the revocation of the practice authorization, thereby upholding the prior decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della decisione amministrativa onorario esenzione dall'autorizzazione d'intesa violazione del dovere motivi medici conformità amministrativa Wirtschaftliche Sozialhilfe | Sozialhilfe
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 81 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Fürsorgebehörde Freienbach, Churerstrasse 15, \n Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Vorinstanz I, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n |\n

\n\n

\n