Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 77 • VG SZ III 2018 77 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Appeal Regarding Annexed Structure Removal

Numero d'incarto III 2018 77
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a municipal council's decision, upheld by the cantonal government, to deny a building permit for an existing structure based on an interpretation of building regulations concerning the mandatory removal of annexed structures upon rebuilding. The court reasoned that the municipal authority's interpretation was legally unsound because the relevant statute for the mandatory removal of annexed structures only applies when a complete rebuilding of the existing structure is undertaken, which was not the case here as the application sought only a partial reconstruction of the roof and conversion of the attic space, thus the original structure, despite annexes, remained.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Appeal Regarding Annexed Structure Removal: The court reasoned that the municipal authority's interpretation was legally unsound because the relevant statute for the mandatory removal of annexed structures only applies when a complete rebuilding of the existing structure is undertaken, which was not the case here as the application sought only a partial reconstruction of the roof and conversion of the attic space, thus the original structure, despite annexes, remained.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale legittimazione a contestare licenza norme per l'edilizia abusivismo edilizio autorizzazione parziale divieto di demolizione Planungs- und Baurecht (Korrektur Erschliessungsplan) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 6. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n