Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 76 • VG SZ III 2018 76 Generato dall'IA

Residence Status Appeal After Divorce

Numero d'incarto III 2018 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision concerning their residence status, which was based on a previous marriage that had ended, and the subsequent rejection of an extension of their temporary stay permit by the cantonal migration authority and government council. The court reasoned that the applicant, while having demonstrated integration and having ties to the country through their residency, failed to establish a new primary basis for their continued stay, as the termination of the previous spousal relationship extinguished the primary right to residency, and the grounds presented for an extension did not meet the statutory requirements for an autonomous right to remain.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 Abs. 1 BStGer, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStGer; Residence Status Appeal After Divorce: The court reasoned that the applicant, while having demonstrated integration and having ties to the country through their residency, failed to establish a new primary basis for their continued stay, as the termination of the previous spousal relationship extinguished the primary right to residency, and the grounds presented for an extension did not meet the statutory requirements for an autonomous right to remain.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statuto di dimora causa di divorzio diritto di rimanere rettifica degli atti di stato civile base legale misura di allontanamento nel diritto degli stranieri

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BStGer
The appeal is declared inadmissible because the contested decision is not final.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStGer
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 159
Spousal Residency Retention Post-Divorce Integration Requirements
III 2020 45
Residence Permit Revocation After Short Marriage Separation
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2020 10
Residence Permit Revocation Upheld Despite Post-Marital Hardship Claim
III 2022 188
Residence Permit Revocation Following Separation Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BStGer

The appeal is declared inadmissible because the contested decision is not final.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BStGer

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. Staatssekretariat für Migration SEM, Quellenweg 6, 3003 Bern, \n Beigeladen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n