Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 75 • VG SZ III 2018 75 Generato dall'IA

Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal)

Numero d'incarto III 2018 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A driver appealed a decision by the road traffic authority to provisionally withdraw their driving license due to suspected dangerous driving behavior. The court reviewed the evidence regarding the alleged driving offense and determined that the authority's initial assessment, which justified the immediate precautionary measure of seizing the license based on the initial suspicion of a significant traffic violation demonstrating unsuitability to drive, was sufficiently reasoned and legally sound under the circumstances presented.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal): The court reviewed the evidence regarding the alleged driving offense and determined that the authority's initial assessment, which justified the immediate precautionary measure of seizing the license based on the initial suspicion of a significant traffic violation demonstrating unsuitability to drive, was sufficiently reasoned and legally sound under the circumstances presented.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre infrazione alle norme della circolazione guida in stato di inattitudine decisione motivata corsa di controllo valutazione delle prove
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 90
Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal
III 2018 183
Driver License Withdrawal Appeal Over Suspected Speeding
III 2019 188
Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Based on Traffic Offenses
III 2019 196
Driver License Withdrawal Appeal
III 2019 177
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug des Führerausweises) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: