Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 74 • VG SZ III 2018 74 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality

Numero d'incarto III 2018 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a decision regarding a construction project, specifically appealing against the local construction and environmental authority, the office for spatial development, and the cantonal government council. The core of the dispute involved the legality of the construction permit granted for the project, with the appellant contesting the administrative decisions made by the lower authorities. The court ultimately upheld the prior rulings, affirming the validity of the construction authorization based on its determination that the administrative proceedings and the resulting permit complied with the relevant spatial planning and building regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality: The core of the dispute involved the legality of the construction permit granted for the project, with the appellant contesting the administrative decisions made by the lower authorities. The court ultimately upheld the prior rulings, affirming the validity of the construction authorization based on its determination that the administrative proceedings and the resulting permit complied with the relevant spatial planning and building regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità della licenza edilizia norme per l'edilizia autorità amministrativa costruzione abusiva contratto di costruzione servitù di limitazione di costruzione Planungs- und Baurecht (Wiederherstellung; Abbruch) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2010 99
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Validity and Zoning Regulations
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2024 179
Building Permit Appeals Litigation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 74 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, \n Rathausweg 4, Postfach 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bauund Umweltbehörde Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, \n Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n