Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 7 • VG SZ III 2018 7 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Height Limit Dispute Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2018 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant challenged a municipal planning decision concerning the height of a construction project, arguing the relevant zoning regulations were misinterpreted or misapplied, specifically regarding the permissible building height limit. The court, however, found that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted and applied the statutory planning provisions, which allowed for the approved building height under the existing zoning scheme and development plan, thus dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Zoning Height Limit Dispute Dismissed: The court, however, found that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted and applied the statutory planning provisions, which allowed for the approved building height under the existing zoning scheme and development plan, thus dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
altezza massima dell'edificio piano di utilizzazione limiti legali legittimazione a contestare licenza deroga alla licenza edilizia disciplina urbanistica
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 71
Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance
III 2019 122
Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations
III 2025 1
Building Permit Challenge Dismissed on Zoning Compliance
III 2024 195
Zoning Dispute Over Building Permit Approval
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 7 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt R.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n