Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 54 • VG SZ III 2018 54 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Building Permit Denial Regarding Procedural Compliance

Numero d'incarto III 2018 54
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision by an administrative authority regarding a building permit, contesting the procedural correctness of the administrative actions taken by various government bodies. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative process, including the involvement of the relevant cantonal and district authorities, sufficiently guaranteed the appellant's right to be heard and to participate in the proceedings, and that the challenged decision complied with the applicable planning and procedural regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Building Permit Denial Regarding Procedural Compliance: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative process, including the involvement of the relevant cantonal and district authorities, sufficiently guaranteed the appellant's right to be heard and to participate in the proceedings, and that the challenged decision complied with the applicable planning and procedural regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla licenza edilizia diritti procedurali conformità amministrativa revoca della decisione amministrativa approvazione dei piani non attribuzione a una zona Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2018 120
Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Denial
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 54 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n