Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 44 • VG SZ III 2018 44 Generato dall'IA

Provisional Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Initial Culpability Findings

Numero d'incarto III 2018 44
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual challenged a provisional withdrawal of their driving license imposed by the traffic authority following an administrative proceeding concerning a road traffic offense. The court reasoned that the authority was justified in imposing the provisional measure because the individual's culpability was deemed sufficient based on the initial findings, thereby creating a significant likelihood of a final measure affecting their fitness to drive, which warranted immediate protective action.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Provisional Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Initial Culpability Findings: The court reasoned that the authority was justified in imposing the provisional measure because the individual's culpability was deemed sufficient based on the initial findings, thereby creating a significant likelihood of a final measure affecting their fitness to drive, which warranted immediate protective action.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre idoneità alla guida "Validità provvisoria" confisca del veicolo a motore condotta colpevole procedura di ricusazione Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 142
Motorist License Withdrawal Upheld Over Fitness Concerns
III 2019 177
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving
III 2021 90
Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal
III 2021 143
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Upheld Based on Prior Offenses and Reckless Racing Conviction
III 2018 31
Provisional License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Drug Possession and Admission of Use

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 44 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: