Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 227 • VG SZ III 2018 227 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2018 227
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant appealed a decision by a municipal council and subsequent cantonal governmental council regarding an administrative matter, with an interested homeowner's association also participating as an intervener. The court upheld the lower authority decisions, reasoning that the challenged administrative act did not violate any legal provisions, as the administrative bodies had correctly applied the relevant zoning and construction regulations when issuing their determination concerning the property in question.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld: The court upheld the lower authority decisions, reasoning that the challenged administrative act did not violate any legal provisions, as the administrative bodies had correctly applied the relevant zoning and construction regulations when issuing their determination concerning the property in question.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prescrizioni di zona autorità comunali legittimazione a contestare licenza variante del piano regolatore giustizia di prossimità urbanistica Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung Treppenanbau) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2022 111
Zoning Plan Modification Upheld Despite Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs for the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 227 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. C.________ (STWEG), \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n