Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 222 • VG SZ III 2018 222 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Concerning Minor's Educational and Living Placement

Numero d'incarto III 2018 222
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal concerning the placement of a minor, where the appellant, the mother acting as the legal representative for her child, challenged decisions made by the school authority, the cantonal government, the Child and Adult Protection Authority, and the welfare authority regarding the child's educational and living situation. The court reasoned by reviewing the administrative decisions concerning the child's best interests, likely upholding or modifying the prior determinations regarding the appropriate educational placement and supervision based on the established facts and legal standards governing child welfare and education.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Appeal Concerning Minor's Educational and Living Placement: The court reasoned by reviewing the administrative decisions concerning the child's best interests, likely upholding or modifying the prior determinations regarding the appropriate educational placement and supervision based on the established facts and legal standards governing child welfare and education.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse del figlio condizione giuridica del minorenne mutamento della residenza del minore autorità amministrativa protezione del figlio riesame della curatela

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive to determine the costs associated with the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 222 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin 1, \n gesetzlich vertreten durch ihre Mutter B.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin 2, \n beide Beschwerdeführerinnen vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Volksschulen und Sport, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2191, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz I, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n3. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Beigeladene I, \n4. Fürsorgebehörde E.________ \n Beigeladene II, \n |\n

\n\n

\n