Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 220 • VG SZ III 2018 220 Generato dall'IA

Child Protection Authority Appeal Regarding Prior Administrative Determination

Numero d'incarto III 2018 220
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A child protection authority appealed a decision concerning a legal situation involving multiple preceding instances, including a cantonal governmental council and a school authority, with the child's parents and another welfare authority also participating as interested parties. The court likely reviewed the jurisdictional scope or the correctness of a prior administrative determination regarding the child's welfare or status, ultimately upholding or overturning the lower authority's decision based on the applicable statutes governing child protection and administrative procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Child Protection Authority Appeal Regarding Prior Administrative Determination: The court likely reviewed the jurisdictional scope or the correctness of a prior administrative determination regarding the child's welfare or status, ultimately upholding or overturning the lower authority's decision based on the applicable statutes governing child protection and administrative procedure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità amministrativa messa in pericolo del bene del figlio estensione della protezione privazione dell'autorità parentale decisione condizionale autorità di protezione degli adulti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this procedural rule.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are imposed on the appellant based on this provision.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 55
Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this procedural rule.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are imposed on the appellant based on this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 220 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Volksschulen und Sport, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2191, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n3. A.________ und B.________, \n Beigeladene I und II, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n4. Fürsorgebehörde E.________, \n Beigeladene III, \n |\n

\n\n

\n