Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 218 • VG SZ III 2018 218 Generato dall'IA

Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension

Numero d'incarto III 2018 218
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought judicial review of a decision by the traffic authority to temporarily suspend their driving license as a precautionary measure following an incident. The court reasoned that the authority was entitled to impose such a measure based on evidence suggesting a significant danger posed by the driver, as the primary purpose of a precautionary license withdrawal is to immediately prevent further risk to traffic safety, and this measure can be justified even before a final assessment of the underlying violation is complete.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension: The court reasoned that the authority was entitled to impose such a measure based on evidence suggesting a significant danger posed by the driver, as the primary purpose of a precautionary license withdrawal is to immediately prevent further risk to traffic safety, and this measure can be justified even before a final assessment of the underlying violation is complete.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre sindacato giurisdizionale infrazione alle norme della circolazione guida in stato di inattitudine licenza obbligatoria valutazione dei rischi Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 202
Traffic Authority v. Driver (Provisional License Seizure)
III 2018 75
Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal)
III 2017 190
Judicial Review of Driving License Revocation
III 2020 135
Suspension of Driving License Due to Suspected Unreliability Upheld
III 2021 91
Traffic License Withdrawal Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 218 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: