Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 216 • VG SZ III 2018 216 Generato dall'IA

Planning Decision Challenge Against Municipal Council and Cantonal Authorities

Numero d'incarto III 2018 216
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a challenge by two parties against the municipal council, the Cantonal Office for Spatial Development, and the Cantonal Government regarding a planning decision. The court's reasoning for its verdict, which was issued on April 24, 2019, focused on the specific legal and administrative context of the challenged planning matter, resulting in the decision reached by the presiding judge and two other judges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Planning Decision Challenge Against Municipal Council and Cantonal Authorities: The court's reasoning for its verdict, which was issued on April 24, 2019, focused on the specific legal and administrative context of the challenged planning matter, resulting in the decision reached by the presiding judge and two other judges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnazione di decisioni amministrative autorità comunali urbanistica elezioni locali deroga alla licenza edilizia e-government Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 231
Spatial Planning Dispute: Municipal and Cantonal Decisions Challenged
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 216 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B._________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n