Appeal of Protective Measure Decision
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a decision by the child and adult protection authority regarding a protective measure, where the core dispute likely involved the appropriateness or continuation of that measure concerning the appellant. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual basis and legal justification presented by the authority for imposing the protective measure, ultimately affirming or overturning the decision based on whether the authority acted within its statutory mandate and demonstrated a reasonable necessity for the intervention affecting the appellant's rights.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Protective Measure Decision: The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual basis and legal justification presented by the authority for imposing the protective measure, ultimately affirming or overturning the decision based on whether the authority acted within its statutory mandate and demonstrated a reasonable necessity for the intervention affecting the appellant's rights.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Appellant must bear the court costs.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 212 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, |\n
\n\n
\n