Revision Request Dismissed in Driving License Withdrawal Case
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn applicant sought a revision of a prior administrative court decision regarding the precautionary withdrawal of a driving license, initiated by the traffic authority based on erratic driving observed over a prolonged period, including speeding, dangerous overtaking, and ignoring traffic signals, which raised serious concerns about the applicant's fitness to drive. The court dismissed the revision request because the grounds for revision, such as the discovery of new, decisive evidence or a fundamental procedural error in the previous ruling, were not met; specifically, the previously established facts supporting the immediate precautionary measure remained valid, demonstrating a continued, serious threat to public road safety that justified the administrative action.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IARevision Request Dismissed in Driving License Withdrawal Case: The court dismissed the revision request because the grounds for revision, such as the discovery of new, decisive evidence or a fundamental procedural error in the previous ruling, were not met; specifically, the previously established facts supporting the immediate precautionary measure remained valid, demonstrating a continued, serious threat to public road safety that justified the administrative action.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 210 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Gesuchsgegner, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Revisionsgesuch gegen den Entscheid des Verwaltungsgerichts VGE III 2017 208 vom 20.12.2017 betreffend vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n
\n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: