Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 209 • VG SZ III 2018 209 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement

Numero d'incarto III 2018 209
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal challenging a lower court's decision regarding the adult protection law, specifically challenging an existing protective measure for a severely disabled person and requesting an alternative care arrangement. The court reasoned that the appellant, despite asserting a right to self-determination and a preference for a different arrangement, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that the existing protective measure was no longer appropriate or that the requested alternative was demonstrably better suited to the person's best interests, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement: The court reasoned that the appellant, despite asserting a right to self-determination and a preference for a different arrangement, failed to sufficiently demonstrate that the existing protective measure was no longer appropriate or that the requested alternative was demonstrably better suited to the person's best interests, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
protezione degli adulti protezione dalla disdetta diritti degli anziani legittimazione a ricorrere diritto di visita dovere di diligenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 86
Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult
III 2021 150
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Welfare Measures
III 2020 127
Child and Adult Protective Services Appeal
III 2021 140
Appeal Against Continuation of Protective Measure for Person
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 208 und 209 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Verfahren III 2018 208: A.________, K.________, Beschwerdeführerin I, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin L.________, und Verfahren III 2018 209: B.________, , \n Beschwerdeführerin II |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n D.________, , \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Begehren um Aufhebung einer Massnahme/ andere Betreuungslösung für eine schwerbehinderte Person/ Vorfrage) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: