Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 207 • VG SZ III 2018 207 Generato dall'IA

Immigration Residence Permit Denial for Insufficient Family Ties

Numero d'incarto III 2018 207
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought judicial review against decisions from the cantonal government and the Office of Migration concerning their immigration status, challenging the denial of an application for a residence permit based on family reunification grounds. The court reasoned that the initial application failed to demonstrate the necessary sustained cohabitation and genuine marital relationship required by the relevant immigration laws, as the evidence only established a marriage of short duration and insufficient integration factors, thus affirming the prior rejections of the residence permit request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Immigration Residence Permit Denial for Insufficient Family Ties: The court reasoned that the initial application failed to demonstrate the necessary sustained cohabitation and genuine marital relationship required by the relevant immigration laws, as the evidence only established a marriage of short duration and insufficient integration factors, thus affirming the prior rejections of the residence permit request.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
permesso di famiglia situazione familiare sindacato giurisdizionale annullamento della cittadinanza agevolata ricongiungimento familiare differito politica dell'immigrazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article was cited for the allocation of court costs to the losing party.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 27
Appeal Regarding Denial of Family Reunification Residence Permits
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2017 231
Appeal Against Denial of Residence Permits Based on Insufficient Integration and Means
III 2020 78
Judicial Review of Residence Permit Extension Denial Based on Integration Factors
III 2020 194
Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Residence Permit Based on Insufficient Integration

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article was cited for the allocation of court costs to the losing party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 207 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, \n Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n