Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 206 • VG SZ III 2018 206 Generato dall'IA

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement

Numero d'incarto III 2018 206
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Several property owners challenged a municipal decision to establish a public right-of-way easement across their land to connect two public paths, arguing that the easement imposed an excessive burden and that the municipality failed to properly consider alternative routes or adequately compensate them for the expropriation. The court reasoned that the municipality was justified in establishing the easement because the public interest in creating a continuous, functional path network outweighed the private property owners' interest, and while the burden was present, it was not disproportionate to the public benefit achieved, thus affirming the legality of the established easement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement: The court reasoned that the municipality was justified in establishing the easement because the public interest in creating a continuous, functional path network outweighed the private property owners' interest, and while the burden was present, it was not disproportionate to the public benefit achieved, thus affirming the legality of the established easement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servitù terreno comunale diritto di proprietà espropriazione diritto di espropriare appropriazione indebita di beni demaniali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was applied to determine the costs of the federal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2018 29
Municipality v. Easement Scope for Construction Use
III 2018 136
Property Owner v. Municipality (Infrastructure Requirement for Building Permit)
III 2023 196
Property Owners' Access Rights Over Private Road Upheld
III 2019 6
Expropriation for Utility Easement Connection
III 2023 47
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Service Road Designation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was applied to determine the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 206 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. F.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n