Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 205 • VG SZ III 2018 205 Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Land Conversion Appeal Decision Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2018 205
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged an administrative decision concerning agricultural land use, specifically appealing a ruling by the agricultural office regarding the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court reasoned that the administrative decision was sound because the statutory requirements for granting the conversion permission were not met, emphasizing that the primary purpose of the land use regulations is to preserve agricultural land, and the appellant failed to demonstrate the necessary exceptional circumstances or public interest to justify the deviation from this principle.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Land Conversion Appeal Decision Upheld: The court reasoned that the administrative decision was sound because the statutory requirements for granting the conversion permission were not met, emphasizing that the primary purpose of the land use regulations is to preserve agricultural land, and the appellant failed to demonstrate the necessary exceptional circumstances or public interest to justify the deviation from this principle.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo agricolo diritto fondiario protrazione dell'affitto requisito legale agricoltura sostenibile diritto di libero pascolo
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 11
Agricultural Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Untimely Land Conversion
III 2017 60
Appeal Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Building to Commercial Center
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2016 134
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 205 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Mai 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________ |\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n|\n |\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n