Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 204 • VG SZ III 2018 204 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment

Numero d'incarto III 2018 204
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision by the local Child and Adult Protection Authority to establish a protective trusteeship (Beistandschaft) for them, concerning their personal and financial affairs. The court determined that the appellate court correctly confirmed the necessity of the trusteeship because the appellant, despite being capable of making decisions in principle, consistently failed to take necessary measures to safeguard their personal welfare and financial interests, necessitating the intervention based on legal provisions regarding the protection of vulnerable adults.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment: The court determined that the appellate court correctly confirmed the necessity of the trusteeship because the appellant, despite being capable of making decisions in principle, consistently failed to take necessary measures to safeguard their personal welfare and financial interests, necessitating the intervention based on legal provisions regarding the protection of vulnerable adults.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misure di protezione dei minori protezione degli adulti necessità responsabilità del curatore disposizioni finanziarie regime di amministrazione fiduciaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was used to regulate the court costs following the dismissal of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2022 51
Establishment of Protective Guardianship for Financially Vulnerable Individual
III 2019 86
Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2018 212
Appeal of Protective Measure Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was used to regulate the court costs following the dismissal of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 204 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Beistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: