Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 201 • VG SZ III 2018 201 Generato dall'IA

Company Appeal Regarding Industrial Noise Abatement Requirements

Numero d'incarto III 2018 201
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision regarding a cantonal environmental protection measure, specifically concerning a requirement to implement noise abatement measures for an industrial facility operating near residential areas. The court reasoned that the existing noise levels exceeded the legally permissible limits during certain times, and the lower instances correctly determined that the facility operator bore the responsibility to implement necessary noise reduction steps to comply with environmental protection standards, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Company Appeal Regarding Industrial Noise Abatement Requirements: The court reasoned that the existing noise levels exceeded the legally permissible limits during certain times, and the lower instances correctly determined that the facility operator bore the responsibility to implement necessary noise reduction steps to comply with environmental protection standards, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
norma ambientale considerazioni di protezione ambientale livello sonoro livello di protezione diritto industriale società d'esercizio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 1
Cantonal Noise Remediation Project Overturned Due to Outdated Traffic Expert Opinion
II 2021 19
Cantonal Council v. Company (Building Permit Denial)
III 2019 229
Appeal Against Noise Assessment Condition in Planning Permission Upheld
III 2021 176
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Setbacks and Noise Assessment Methodology
III 2024 32
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Residential Renovation and Pool Addition: Noise Protection Ruling

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 201 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Amt für Umweltschutz, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2162, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n