Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 181 • VG SZ III 2018 181 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision

Numero d'incarto III 2018 181
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging the partial revision of a zoning plan by a municipal council. The appellants contested the decision regarding the land use designation, which had immediate practical consequences for their property rights. The court reasoned that the initial administrative decision did not violate applicable law, particularly concerning the requirement for a justifiable public interest in the planning changes and adherence to procedural regulations regarding the scope of the revision, thus upholding the lower administrative decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision: The appellants contested the decision regarding the land use designation, which had immediate practical consequences for their property rights. The court reasoned that the initial administrative decision did not violate applicable law, particularly concerning the requirement for a justifiable public interest in the planning changes and adherence to procedural regulations regarding the scope of the revision, thus upholding the lower administrative decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione del piano regolatore terreno comunale utilizzazione del fondo revisione processuale diritto di utilizzazione decisione parziale
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2022 111
Zoning Plan Modification Upheld Despite Appeal
III 2024 110
Property Owners' Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Amendment
III 2018 93
Zoning Amendment Upholding Local Development Plan
III 2022 123
Municipal Land-Use Re-zoning Upheld Against Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 181 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juni 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, vertreten durch C.________, 3. C.________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Teilrevision Nutzungsplanung Küssnacht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: