Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 180 • VG SZ III 2018 180 Generato dall'IA

LLC Development Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2018 180
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A limited liability company appealed a decision regarding a development matter, challenging the rulings of the local municipal council, the Cantonal Office for Spatial Development, and the Cantonal Government. The core issue involved the legality of a development decision impacting the appellant. The court likely dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative decisions under review were either procedurally correct or that the appellant lacked sufficient standing or substantive grounds to overturn the prior determinations concerning the spatial planning or building regulations at issue.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG; LLC Development Appeal Dismissed: The core issue involved the legality of a development decision impacting the appellant. The court likely dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative decisions under review were either procedurally correct or that the appellant lacked sufficient standing or substantive grounds to overturn the prior determinations concerning the spatial planning or building regulations at issue.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
società a responsabilità limitata legittimazione a ricorrere legittimazione a contestare licenza obbligo d'urbanizzazione motivazione nel merito motivo di revisione Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to allocate court costs for the appeal.
Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG
This provision governs the compensation of procedural costs for the opposing parties.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 163
LLC Appeal on Zoning Regulations and Building Volume
III 2021 211
Corporation Planning Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing
III 2024 104
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing to Challenge Development Plan
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2018 160
Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to allocate court costs for the appeal.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG

This provision governs the compensation of procedural costs for the opposing parties.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 180 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n

\n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Altendorf, Dorfplatz 3, Postfach 155, 8852 Altendorf, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. C.________, \n5. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n Ziff. 4 und 5 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n