Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 178 • VG SZ III 2018 178 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2018 178
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding a measure affecting their legal status, which involved the authority intervening in personal matters. The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the authority's decision was contrary to law or that the established facts were incorrectly assessed, thus upholding the authority's application of the relevant protective measures.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision: The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the authority's decision was contrary to law or that the established facts were incorrectly assessed, thus upholding the authority's application of the relevant protective measures.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti misure di protezione dei minori ricorso per carenza privazione dell'autorità parentale legittimazione a ricorrere statuto giuridico
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2022 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Protective Measures Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2019 16
Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 178 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, \n B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n