Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 176 • VG SZ III 2018 176 Generato dall'IA

Driver License Revocation Appeal Based on Culpability Assessment

Numero d'incarto III 2018 176
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A driver appealed a decision by the traffic authority to revoke their driving license based on traffic offenses, arguing that the authority had incorrectly applied a previous ruling regarding the assessment of culpability. The court reasoned that the authority's decision was sound because the previous ruling concerning reduced culpability required objective indicators of extraordinary circumstances not present in this case, and therefore, the original assessment of the severity of the traffic violations leading to the license revocation was appropriate and legally correct.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Driver License Revocation Appeal Based on Culpability Assessment: The court reasoned that the authority's decision was sound because the previous ruling concerning reduced culpability required objective indicators of extraordinary circumstances not present in this case, and therefore, the original assessment of the severity of the traffic violations leading to the license revocation was appropriate and legally correct.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione ritiro della concessione valutazione dell'idoneità alla guida guida nonostante revoca della patente revoca straordinaria guida recidiva in stato di ebbrezza Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 159
Driver License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal
III 2018 26
Driver License Revocation Upheld
III 2020 33
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2022 40
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 176 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 6. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: