Traffic Authority v. License Holder (Preliminary Seizure Appeal)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe applicant appealed a preliminary seizure of their driving license ordered by the traffic authority following an administrative investigation concerning suspected traffic violations. The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the authority was justified in ordering the preliminary seizure based on sufficiently established facts indicating the applicant's unsuitability to drive, given the seriousness of the suspected offenses, which created an immediate danger to public safety that necessitated prompt protective measures to secure traffic safety pending further proceedings.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IATraffic Authority v. License Holder (Preliminary Seizure Appeal): The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the authority was justified in ordering the preliminary seizure based on sufficiently established facts indicating the applicant's unsuitability to drive, given the seriousness of the suspected offenses, which created an immediate danger to public safety that necessitated prompt protective measures to secure traffic safety pending further proceedings.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 172 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, B.________ 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: