Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 170 • VG SZ III 2018 170 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2018 170
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision concerning building rights where the appellants sought to overturn a municipal council's permit for a construction project, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal government. The court reasoned that the appellants failed to demonstrate that the decision by the lower authorities, which granted the building permit, violated any applicable legal provisions, particularly regarding the protection of their interests or any misapplication of planning law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung; Beschwerdelegitimation; aufsichtsrechtliche Aufhebung eines Vorentscheides) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia proprietà fondiaria deroga alla licenza edilizia divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico protezione dalla disdetta diritto di manifestare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellants are ordered to pay the costs because their appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellants are ordered to pay the costs because their appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 170 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, handelnd durch die Präsidentin \n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n