Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 17 • VG SZ III 2018 17 Generato dall'IA

Supervised Leave Denial Annulled for Insufficient Factual Basis

Numero d'incarto III 2018 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought permission for supervised leave from a penal institution, which the responsible authority denied. The appellant challenged this denial, arguing that the authority failed to properly consider the legal requirements for granting supervised release, particularly concerning the assessment of the risk posed by the appellant and the suitability of the proposed supervision plan. The court reasoned that the authority's decision lacked a sufficient factual basis and failed to adequately weigh the statutory criteria, particularly the public interest in safety against the rehabilitative goals of partial release, thus necessitating the annulment of the decision and remittance for a new assessment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Supervised Leave Denial Annulled for Insufficient Factual Basis: The appellant challenged this denial, arguing that the authority failed to properly consider the legal requirements for granting supervised release, particularly concerning the assessment of the risk posed by the appellant and the suitability of the proposed supervision plan. The court reasoned that the authority's decision lacked a sufficient factual basis and failed to adequately weigh the statutory criteria, particularly the public interest in safety against the rehabilitative goals of partial release, thus necessitating the annulment of the decision and remittance for a new assessment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
base fattuale requisito legale criteri di valutazione annullamento del licenziamento ferie non retribuite decisione parziale Strafvollzug (Begehren um begleiteten Ausgang) | Strafvollzug
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 67
Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility
BEK 2019 60
Appeal Against Detention Denied for Lack of Specific Legal Grounds
III 2022 35
Appeal Regarding Continuation of Welfare Supervision
III 2020 102
Judicial Review of Denial of Early Prison Release Based on Statutory Compliance
II 2019 83
Appeal Regarding Lawful Termination of Employment Due to Management Prerogatives and Employee Non-Cooperation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 17 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Sandra Sutter-Jeker, Totentanz 4, Postfach 1059, 4001 Basel, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Justizvollzug, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 73, 8836 Bennau, Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strafvollzug (Begehren um begleiteten Ausgang) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: