Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 169 • VG SZ III 2018 169 Generato dall'IA

Supervisory Annulment of Preliminary Planning Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2018 169
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision regarding planning and building law, specifically challenging the supervisory annulment of a preliminary decision by the municipal council, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal government council. The core issue involved the supervisory authority's power to revoke a prior preliminary decision under administrative law principles, which the court ultimately upheld, reasoning that the preliminary decision was unlawfully issued because it lacked the necessary factual and legal basis at the time of its issuance, thus justifying its annulment through the supervisory process.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Supervisory Annulment of Preliminary Planning Decision: The core issue involved the supervisory authority's power to revoke a prior preliminary decision under administrative law principles, which the court ultimately upheld, reasoning that the preliminary decision was unlawfully issued because it lacked the necessary factual and legal basis at the time of its issuance, thus justifying its annulment through the supervisory process.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione pregiudiziale ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione potere di controllo approvazione dei piani autorità amministrativa decisione motivata
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 169 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Aufsichtsrechtliche Aufhebung eines Vorentscheides) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: