Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 168 • VG SZ III 2018 168 Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. Local Council on Initiative Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto III 2018 168
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a local council's decision that deemed their municipal initiative proposal inadmissible on formal grounds, specifically concerning a lack of proper coordination with related prior votes. The court reasoned that the challenged decision was founded on a factual error regarding the prerequisite for the initiative's formal submission, namely the status of a prior related resolution, which had not yet become legally effective at the time of the council's review, thus rendering the council's rejection premature and legally unsubstantiated.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. Local Council on Initiative Inadmissibility: The court reasoned that the challenged decision was founded on a factual error regarding the prerequisite for the initiative's formal submission, namely the status of a prior related resolution, which had not yet become legally effective at the time of the council's review, thus rendering the council's rejection premature and legally unsubstantiated.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di petizione iniziativa costituzionale referendum chiesto dall'autorità motivo di revisione autonomia comunale legittimazione a contestare licenza Politische Rechte (Zulässigkeit eines Initiativbegehrens) | Politische Rechte
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 161
Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility
III 2022 66
Municipal Council Building Regulation Enforcement Appeal Inadmissibility
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge
III 2018 107
Citizens' Initiative Challenging School Closure Deemed Inadmissible

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 168 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Lachen, 8853 Lachen, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Politische Rechte (Zulässigkeit eines Initiativbegehrens) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: