Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 163 • VG SZ III 2018 163 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Denial of Building Permit in Protected Zone

Numero d'incarto III 2018 163
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision regarding a building permit application that was previously denied by the lower administrative bodies. The appellant sought to overturn the rejection of their construction plans, which concerned a property within a protected zone. The court reasoned that the original application failed to demonstrate sufficient public interest justification or adherence to the specific, strict development constraints imposed by the relevant zoning and environmental regulations for the designated area, thus affirming the lower authorities' denial as legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Denial of Building Permit in Protected Zone: The appellant sought to overturn the rejection of their construction plans, which concerned a property within a protected zone. The court reasoned that the original application failed to demonstrate sufficient public interest justification or adherence to the specific, strict development constraints imposed by the relevant zoning and environmental regulations for the designated area, thus affirming the lower authorities' denial as legally sound.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
zona edificabile licenza edilizia zona protetta prescrizioni di zona impugnazione di decisioni amministrative interesse giuridicamente protetto
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2018 120
Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Denial
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 163 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n