Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 160 • VG SZ III 2018 160 Generato dall'IA

Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2018 160
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property development company appealed a municipal decision concerning the approval of a construction project, which was subsequently upheld by the Cantonal Building Authority and the Cantonal Government, leading to the final administrative recourse. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authorities correctly interpreted and applied the applicable planning and zoning regulations, finding no violation of the appealing party's procedural or substantive rights in the issuance of the building permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 103 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authorities correctly interpreted and applied the applicable planning and zoning regulations, finding no violation of the appealing party's procedural or substantive rights in the issuance of the building permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione incentivazione immobiliare violazione delle norme edilizie imprese di costruzione diritti procedurali diritto di proprietà Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 103 lit. a BGG
The appeal is dismissed because it concerns a preliminary decision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 191
Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 103 lit. a BGG

The appeal is dismissed because it concerns a preliminary decision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 160 III 2019 36 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. C.________ AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n