Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 157 • VG SZ III 2018 157 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Protection Measures and Custodian Appointment

Numero d'incarto III 2018 157
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding the assumption of child protection measures and the appointment of a custodian. The appellant challenged the lower court's ruling on these protective measures for the child. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the established facts justified the continuation or imposition of the specific child protection measures and the appointment of the custodian, thereby confirming the prior determination regarding the child's welfare needs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Protection Measures and Custodian Appointment: The appellant challenged the lower court's ruling on these protective measures for the child. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the established facts justified the continuation or imposition of the specific child protection measures and the appointment of the custodian, thereby confirming the prior determination regarding the child's welfare needs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
misure di protezione dei minori procedura di affidamento genitoriale nomina del curatore collocamento del minore pena privativa della libertà esercizio del diritto di visita
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2018 221
Appeal of Child Protection Measure Adjustment
III 2019 141
Modification of Child Protection Measures Appeal
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2017 210
Child Protection Placement Appeal Remanded for Clarification

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 157 III 2018 158 III 2018 159 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________,und J. \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Übernahme von Kindesschutzmassnahmen/ Beistandschaft nach