Mother's Appeal of Fee Award in Child and Adult Protection Case Dismissed for Untimely Reassessment Request
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA mother, acting for herself and her minor child, appealed a decision regarding a fee award concerning child and adult protection law proceedings initiated by the local child and adult protection authority. The court ruled that the mother's claim for compensation was inadmissible because the application to set the fee amount, which was submitted after the underlying decision had already become legally binding, was not an appeal against the decision itself, but rather a request for reassessment that was not permitted under the relevant procedural rules for challenging the fee determination after the finality of the primary ruling.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 68 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Mother's Appeal of Fee Award in Child and Adult Protection Case Dismissed for Untimely Reassessment Request: The court ruled that the mother's claim for compensation was inadmissible because the application to set the fee amount, which was submitted after the underlying decision had already become legally binding, was not an appeal against the decision itself, but rather a request for reassessment that was not permitted under the relevant procedural rules for challenging the fee determination after the finality of the primary ruling.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court rejected the appeal regarding the legal aid request.
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 153 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n vertreten durch ihre Mutter B.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerinnen, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, C.________, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Mandatsentschädigung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: