Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 152 • VG SZ III 2018 152 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Debt Enforcement Objection

Numero d'incarto III 2018 152
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a prior administrative decision concerning the enforcement of a debt collection procedure initiated by the respondent. The central issue revolved around whether the appellant had validly filed an objection to the debt enforcement proceedings within the legally prescribed timeframe. The court reasoned that the documentation submitted by the appellant failed to demonstrate that the requisite objection was lodged with the competent authority before the statutory deadline, thereby upholding the prior decision and dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Debt Enforcement Objection: The central issue revolved around whether the appellant had validly filed an objection to the debt enforcement proceedings within the legally prescribed timeframe. The court reasoned that the documentation submitted by the appellant failed to demonstrate that the requisite objection was lodged with the competent authority before the statutory deadline, thereby upholding the prior decision and dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al precetto esecutivo procedura esecutiva termine legale eccezioni processuali tardive autorità amministrativa reclamo amministrativo previo
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 114
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Proceeding Ruling
BEK 2019 145
Appeal Dismissed for Missed Objection Deadline in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2022 158
Appeal Against Payment Order Objection in Debt Enforcement
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2022 139
Challenge to Debt Enforcement Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 152 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, Domizil: Industriestrasse 7, 6440 Brunnen, \n B.________, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n