Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 150 • VG SZ III 2018 150 Generato dall'IA

Municipal Council Appeal Against Cantonal Development Plan Amendment Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Numero d'incarto III 2018 150
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A municipal council challenged a prior decision concerning a development plan amendment, which had been approved by higher cantonal authorities and involved two corporate entities, arguing against the legality of the amendment's scope or procedure. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the municipal council lacked the requisite standing to appeal against a decision made by the higher cantonal bodies concerning a matter in which the municipality itself was an interested party or decision-maker, and that the challenged administrative acts were not shown to violate the appellant's rights or applicable planning law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Municipal Council Appeal Against Cantonal Development Plan Amendment Dismissed for Lack of Standing: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the municipal council lacked the requisite standing to appeal against a decision made by the higher cantonal bodies concerning a matter in which the municipality itself was an interested party or decision-maker, and that the challenged administrative acts were not shown to violate the appellant's rights or applicable planning law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione del comune legittimazione a ricorrere procedura di pianificazione diritto allo sviluppo referendum chiesto dall'autorità approvazione del regolamento
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 150 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, , \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. A.________ AG, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, \n5. C.________ AG, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerinnen, |\n

\n\n

\n