Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 138 • VG SZ III 2018 138 Generato dall'IA

Child Welfare Supervision Upheld Against Parental Challenge

Numero d'incarto III 2018 138
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision that placed their minor child, who had exhibited concerning behavior including drug use, under the supervision of the relevant authorities, with the challenging party disputing the need for supervision and custody measures. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the authorities acted within their legal authority to protect the child's well-being given the established facts of drug use and concerning behavior, and that the imposed measures were proportionate to the risks identified.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Child Welfare Supervision Upheld Against Parental Challenge: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the authorities acted within their legal authority to protect the child's well-being given the established facts of drug use and concerning behavior, and that the imposed measures were proportionate to the risks identified.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
figlio minorenne diritto di visita sorvegliato autorità parentale procedura di protezione dei minori decisione motivata tutela amministrativa Sozialhilfe (Krankenversicherung/Arztrechnungen) | Sozialhilfe

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 215
Supervision and Education Measures Upheld Against Parental Challenge
III 2020 42
Supervised Visitation Upheld Despite Child's Objection
III 2017 55
Parental Custody Restriction for Child Welfare
III 2021 213
Parental Rights Challenge to Minor's Institutional Placement Upheld
III 2021 154
Mother's Custody Suspension Upheld in Child Welfare Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 138 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Fürsorgebehörde Freienbach, Churerstrasse 15, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Vorinstanz I, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n |\n

\n\n

\n