Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 136 • VG SZ III 2018 136 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner v. Municipality (Infrastructure Requirement for Building Permit)

Numero d'incarto III 2018 136
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner sought judicial review of a municipal decision and subsequent cantonal administrative rulings that upheld the municipality's requirement for the owner to provide infrastructure, specifically a public access road connection, as a prerequisite for a building permit, asserting that the requirement constituted an unconstitutional expropriation without compensation. The court reasoned that the public right-of-way requirement, imposed to ensure necessary infrastructure access for development in accordance with spatial planning laws, was a permissible regulatory measure rather than a specific expropriation, as the burden imposed did not exceed what could reasonably be expected from the property owner under the existing legal framework for development.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Property Owner v. Municipality (Infrastructure Requirement for Building Permit): The court reasoned that the public right-of-way requirement, imposed to ensure necessary infrastructure access for development in accordance with spatial planning laws, was a permissible regulatory measure rather than a specific expropriation, as the burden imposed did not exceed what could reasonably be expected from the property owner under the existing legal framework for development.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo del permesso di costruzione diritto di passo accesso al fondo strada comunale incentivazione immobiliare diritto allo sviluppo Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2025 131
Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Denial
III 2022 133
Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Setback Enforcement
III 2018 99
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Construction Permit Challenge)
III 2018 206
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement
III 2018 97
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authorities Regarding Building Permit Conditions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 136 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n